The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2002-Dec> msg00159



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

the "right" configuration

  • From: Jan Czmok <jan.czmok@gatel.net>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:56:14 +0100
  • Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 03:19:51 -0500
  • To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
  • User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
  • X-NCC-RegID: de.gatel
  • X-Uptime: 07:40:46 up 20 days, 13:04, 4 users, load average: 0.23, 0.13, 0.10

Dear Collegues,

just a quick question after reading all the specs and docs.
Imaging the following scenario:

	- Cisco 2610 Router at Customer (so it's MPLS-CE ?)
	- Cisco 72xx Router at each POP (so it's MPLS-PE?)
	- Juniper Mxx+Cisco Router at Core (so it's MPLS-P ?)

	Am i right with the namings ?

So to get a working vpn i have to:

	- "ip vrf"ing the interfaces at MPLS-CE towards PE
	- "ip vrf"ing the interface at MPLS-PE towards MPLS-CE
	- run iMBGP at a second instance between the involved PE's
	
	Right ? Or missing something here ?
	

Some questions:

	- what decent routing protocol need to be used between PE/CE ?
	- isis is run in core & mpls-pe vor routing exchanges and
	  iBGP route-reflector for bgp routes.

	
Some working sample configurations might be handy...

--jan

-- 
     Jan Ahrent Czmok - Senior Network Engineer - Access Networks
Global Access Telecommunications, Inc. - Stephanstr. 3 - 60313 Frankfurt
voice: +49 69 299896-35 - fax: +49 69 299896-66 - email: czmok@gatel.de

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml