The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2002-Jul> msg00088



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Cisco Multi-VRF CE or VRF Light

  • From: "M. ELK" <elkou141061@hotmail.com>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 17:54:22 +0000
  • Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 15:06:40 -0400
  • To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jul 2002 17:54:24.0501 (UTC) FILETIME=[A4BCFA50:01C23596]
  • X-Originating-IP: [57.250.229.136]

Hi
 
Ref :
 
 
 
AA- The first ref does not address clearly how to connect a Multi-VRF CE
to a PE using eBGP .
The 2nd Ref (page 11-9) provide a template .
Any doc which list a complete config for Multi-VRF CE using
ebgp to connect to a PE router ??
 
 
BB-from ref 2 : say for 5 VRF on the CE , is it mean a ebgp session per
VRF between the CE and the PE ??
 
Could be easier if the CE  and PE run a modified eBGP VPNV4 .
 a modified in the sense :
At the PE : 
Say the 5 VRF are VRf1 ...VRF5
 
 interface s1
 ip Vrf Forwarding Vrf1,Vrf2,Vrf3,Vrf4,Vrf5
 
address-family VPNV4 VRF vrf1,Vrf2,Vrf3,Vrf4, Vrf5
Nei CE remote-as XXX
...
...
 
a VPNV4 context is configured per VRF(s) and an interface could be
linked to several VRF's .
 
For outgoing eBGP update : advertise route from those VRF routing table , no RT ext-community will be exported .
 
For incoming eBGP update : import the route to the correspending
VRF based on the RD value .  
(Those recieved eBGP VPNV4 update are within the context of  the sepcified VRF (Vrf1 ...VRf5) which mean that they are not propagated to
   other PE's ) .
 
at the CE :  
 
Addrres-family VPNV4 vrf vrf1,vrf2,vrf3,vrf4,vrf5
nei PE remote-as YYY
....
 
 .
 
In such case their is  no need to have a sub-interface for each VRF between the CE and the PE , Separation of VRF traffic is now based on the label .
 
(May be the above is something like Inter-AS RFC 2547 option "a" but
 now is VRF's-to-VRF's  instead of VRF-to-VRF still it is not full fledge
as option "c" or option "b" )  
 
CC- For a Multi-VRF over a CE where it is connected to PE using
  eBGP (one eBGP session per VRF) ,it is not clear the benefit
  (in term of mem and CPU ) of such setup versus the CE runing full PE-functionality . Pls clarify .
 
Brgds


Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here
------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml