The MPLS-OPS Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]
Re: RFC2547bis security
-
From: Rajiv Asati <rajiva@cisco.com>
-
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:24:14 -0400
-
Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
-
Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 21:27:14 -0400
-
To: "M. ELK" <elkou141061@hotmail.com>
-
X-Sender: rajiva@dingdong.cisco.com
At 03:34 PM 7/28/2002, M. ELK wrote:
the draft in section 6 state :
Quote
6. Maintaining Proper Isolation of VPNs
To maintain proper isolation of one VPN from another, it is
important
that no router in the backbone accept a labeled packet from
any
adjacent non-backbone device unless the following two
conditions
hold:
1. the label at the top of the label stack
was actually
distributed by that
backbone router to that non-backbone
device, and
2. the backbone router can determine that
use of that label will
cause the packet to
leave the backbone before any labels lower
in the stack will be
inspected, and before the IP header will
be inspected.
The first condition ensure that any labeled packets received
from
non-backbone routers have a legitimate and properly assigned
label at
the top of the label stack. The second condition
ensures that the
backbone routers will never look below that top label.
Of course,
the simplest way to meet these two conditions is just to
have the
backbone devices refuse to accept labeled packets from
non-backbone
Unquote
For condition nbr "2", how a Router could check such condition
.
Backbone router must only do a one label lookup. No deeper than that.
Cheers,
Rajiv
Brgds
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
Click Here
------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
| |
|