The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] a question about SE sytle reservation
|
Sends | Reserves Receives | | ________ SE( S1{?B} ) <- (a) | (c) |(S1,S2) | (c) <- SE( (S1,S2){2B} ) | | {2B} | | |________| ---------------------|--------------------------------------------- | SE( (S2){2B} ) <- (b) | | | Figure
1: Shared-Explicit (SE) Reservation Example
Figure 1 shows an example of Shared-Explicit
(SE) style reservations. There are two upstream senders; packets from sender S1 arrive through previous hop (a), packets from sender S2 arrive through previous hop (b). There are only one downstream receiver R1; packets bound for R1 are routed via outgoing interface (c) . Sender S1 request SENDER_TSPEC {1B}, and Sender S2 request SENDER_TSPEC {2B}. When SE-style reservations are merged, the flowspec forwarded upstream to S1 should be {1B} or {2B}? |
|