The MPLS-OPS Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]
RE: IGP tuning for TE versus MPLS-TE
-
From: "Islam, Aziz" <aziz.islam@eds.com>
-
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:15:25 -0500
-
Cc: Mathew Lodge <Mathew@CPlane.com>, alok <alok.dube@apara.com>, "M. ELK" <elkou141061@hotmail.com>
-
Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:01:47 -0500
-
To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
Folks,
Another
well-written article can be found in the October issue of IEEE Communications
magazine. The title is "Traffic Engineering with Traditional IP Routing
Protocols".
Aziz S. Islam Sr.Infrastructure Splst.-
CCIE(R/S) EDS-Design Engineering 33 Yonge Street; Suite 400 Toronto,
Ontario M5E 1G4 CANADA phone: (416)814-1696 pager:
(416)517-4985 mailto:aziz.islam@eds.com http://www.eds.com
All,
There is an excellent
discussion of optimal routing done via IGP metrics (no MPLS) vs. explicit path
selection (MPLS TE) from AT&T. You can find it at
http://www.research.att.com/~jrex/papers/ieeecomm02.long.ps http://www.research.att.com/~jrex/papers/ieeecomm02.long.pdf
Note
that this paper is a discussion of theory -- i.e., it addresses how close can
you get to optimal routing using Dijkstra's SPF algorithm with judicious link
weight selection, and what happens to the efficiency of the network when links
fail and IGP re-routes traffic. In practice, I wonder how disruptive it would
be to a regular IP network to go around tinkering with the link weights on
every router with an offline TE tool (which this approach
mandates).
Cheers,
Mathew
At 03:26 PM 10/30/2002
+0530, alok wrote:
what do u do for
"non ip" traffic ;o) can u "TE" it too
with IGP tunning? -rgds alok
----- Original Message -----
From: M. ELK
To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com Sent:
Wednesday, October 30, 2002 3:01 PM Subject: [MPLS-OPS]: IGP
tuning for TE versus MPLS-TE
Their is some hot debate previously
on this list about an article on MPLS which stated that no need for MPLS
,anyhow the conclusion from this debate was that the writer of such
article is clueless . here is a doc from sprint which state exactly
the same : http://www.sprintbiz.com/business/resources/resource/SprintCiscoMPLS.pdf (guess
,could not state that they are clueless too . also the doc have the cisco
logo ) . need not to start another hot debate ,just need U
comment on the possibility and limitation of TE by tuning IGP versus
MPLS-TE , any other provider droped MPLS-TE favoring IGP tunning ? .
Brgds
Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now! Click Here ------- The MPLS-OPS
Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
| Mathew
Lodge
| mathew@cplane.com | | Director, Product
Management | Ph: +1 408 789 4068 | | CPlane,
Inc.
| http://www.cplane.com |
| |
|