The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Haskin/Makam schemes for path protection.
Hi, in MPLS path protection, Haskin scheme does not introduce any packet loss but there will be packets that need reordering. whereas in Makam scheme which is a global repair, there will be packet loss and there will be no packets that need reordering. Why can't we have a system that combines the operations of these two schemes. For example, if a fault occurs, the haskin scheme will initially reroute the packets with out packet loss after intimating the PIL of the fault. the coming traffic to the PIL is then rerouted using Makam scheme. This is just a doubt. Can we consider this kind of mechanism, so that we can reduce packet loss. ---ramu _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml |
|