The MPLS-OPS Archive

["alok" <alok.dube@apara.com>]

yes i mean how is the general performance of video streaming etc..
i know jitter matters on the boxes, and their switching capabilities..
am just wondering if we can have live video feeds and conferences
comfortably on L2VPN setups...is most normal cases..

anyone has any benchmark results...cud be product / topology specific, even
that is fine with me..

-rgds
Alok
----- Original Message -----
From: fraanro <fraanro@arrakis.es>
To: alok <alok.dube@apara.com>
Cc: fraanro <fraanro@arrakis.es>; Emilie Hien <ehien@siticom.com>;
<mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: RE: [MPLS-OPS]: Voice over MPLS


latency and jitter in L2VPNs is not handled in any specific way, it is
not a L2VPN or MPLS related issue, as I see it. It is a matter of which
queuing and priorization mechanisms do you use in your box, no matter
if it is MPLS, L2 or L3, or just IP.

Rgds.
Javier.

----- Mensaje Original -----
Remitente: "alok" <alok.dube@apara.com>
Fecha: Viernes, Septiembre 13, 2002 9:53 am
Asunto: Re: RE: [MPLS-OPS]: Voice over MPLS

> any idea how L2VPNs are at handling "jitter"
>
> latency if constant is not a problem... jitter is a big problem
> though...-rgds
>
> Alok
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: fraanro <fraanro@arrakis.es>
> To: Emilie Hien <ehien@siticom.com>
> Cc: <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:20 PM
> Subject: Re: RE: [MPLS-OPS]: Voice over MPLS
>
>
> Do you mean Voice over IP over MPLS, or any Voice over MPLS direct
> implementation. About the second I do not know about any. About the
> first, the performance should be the same as voice over IP in general,
> because MPLS does not necessarily mean an improvement in performance
> vs. IP routing, but depending on the specific hardware, it might.
>
> Among other things, MPLS may give you a better control over the path
> that the voice over IP traffic follows, ensuring for example that it
> goes always through low delay links, etc. On the other hand if you
> implement things like Path protection or Fast Reroute, the impact on
> the voice conversations of a link or node failure will be minimal,
> whereas without MPLS and these features will take longer to
> recover the
> service.
>
> Hope this helps
> Javier.
>
> ----- Mensaje Original -----
> Remitente: Emilie Hien <ehien@siticom.com>
> Fecha: Jueves, Septiembre 12, 2002 10:46 am
> Asunto: RE: [MPLS-OPS]: Voice over MPLS
>
> > Hi,
> > Do you know if anybody has already tried to implement voice over
> > MPLS and
> > the resulting performance?
> > Thank you in advance
> > Emilie
> >
>
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>
>
>
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml



-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml