The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2003-Aug> msg00056



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: Connections to a facility

  • From: NOC <theguber@hotmail.com>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 12:25:06 +0800
  • Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 01:38:35 -0400
  • To: "Ellington, Maylon" <mellington@gta.ga.gov>, <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
  • User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Aug 2003 04:25:07.0376 (UTC) FILETIME=[5DF3F300:01C36865]
  • X-Originating-Email: [theguber@hotmail.com]
  • X-Originating-IP: [61.222.11.109]

Title: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: Connections to a facility
If you are happy with Frame Relay as the last mile today why not stick with that.

Gives you some flexibility if you want to have a PVC that is not MPLS too.

From: "Ellington, Maylon" <mellington@gta.ga.gov>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:26:13 -0400
To: <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
Subject: [MPLS-OPS]: Connections to a facility
Resent-From: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:43:55 -0400

Greetings,
We are in the process of converting our network from mostly frame-relay to MPLS. Our Service Provider asked us what the connection to our facility will ride over. They recommended the following options: T1-times-n, DS-3, Ethernet or Inverse ATM.
Does anyone know what Inverse ATM is? Also, if you had a choice of how to bring a connection into your facility, what would be your chose?
Thanks in advance for your responses