The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2003-Feb> msg00168



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: ospf-te vs cspf (off-topic doubt)

  • From: Eric Osborne <eosborne@cisco.com>
  • Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:24:18 -0500
  • Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
  • Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:41:31 -0500
  • To: Alexandre Carlos de Oliveira <alexandre@redes.unb.br>
  • User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
  • X-GPG-Fingerprint: 6412 0836 E440 B3EA 980C 4951 611E 1819 2E71 8562

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 04:17:42PM -0200, Alexandre Carlos de Oliveira wrote:
> Can both of these link-state protocol generate a path (the best path not
> the shortest path) based on the resourses available on the links of the
> path? I kown that cspf cam, but i not quite sure about ospf-te
>

CSPF is the calculation that's run on the information provided in the
ospf-te database.  They are the same thing.

Regular OSPF, in case that's what you were really asking, doesn't do
any calculation on anything but link costs.




eric
 
> regrads
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml