The MPLS-OPS Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]
Re: RES: On-line TE?
-
From: Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
-
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:16:32 -0500
-
Cc: "Sandmaier, Jan" <Jan.Sandmaier@t-systems.com>, <ILazar@burtongroup.com>, <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
-
Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:29:29 -0500
-
To: Lavoisier José Leite Farias <lfarias@cpqd.com.br>
-
X-Sender: jvasseur@paris.cisco.com
Hi,
At 13:59 12/03/2003 -0300, Lavoisier José Leite Farias wrote:
Is
there any advantage by choosing one or other option ? I understood by
reading Irwin's answer that on-line TE is used as fault
mechanism.
No, on line TE is not used as a fault mechanism, you have the two
options:
- off-line
(centralized): provides global optimization as the set of TE LSPs are
simultaneously computed by a single entity that makes
use of search mechanisms, to find a placement that
for instance tries to minimize the average load utilization of each link
(this is just one example),
- on-line
(distributed): each LSR independently computes paths for its own set of
TE LSPs using CSPF. Inability to find placement due to
bandwidth
fragmentation can be highly reduced by the use of appropriate mechanisms
like (soft) preemption.
Both are currently deployed by Service Providers.
JP.
I
believe off-line calculation it seems to keep the whole network
optimized. am I correct ?
Regards,
Lavoisier.
- -----Mensagem original-----
- De: Sandmaier, Jan
[mailto:Jan.Sandmaier@t-systems.com]
- Enviada em: quarta-feira, 12 de março de 2003 11:44
- Para: ILazar@burtongroup.com; mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
- Assunto: AW: [MPLS-OPS]: On-line TE?
- Irwin,
-
- the two concepts are not so different. In off-line TE you collect
traffic rates from all your LSPs in the network, feed the traffic matrix
in an optimization engine which produces explicite routes which are used
by a provisioning tool to build up the new paths. It is up to the
oparator when he adjusts the model or which triggers are used for
ajustment. Engineered paths are also adjusted accordingly based on actual
network conditions as with on-line TE. You may use on-line TE/dynamic
LSPs as a fallback mechanism in case of a link outage. The triggers in
on-line TE are configured thresholds and reoptimization timers so there
is no big difference. The difference is more centralized computation
versus distributed.
-
- Jan
- -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
- Von: Irwin Lazar
[mailto:ILazar@burtongroup.com]
- Gesendet: Freitag, 7. März 2003 16:32
- An: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
- Betreff: [MPLS-OPS]: On-line TE?
- I've seen quite a few vendorst that offer sophisticated systems for
off-line TE. My understanding is that this is done by downloading
sample network data into a TE optimization engine?
Correct?
-
- Is there anyone out there doing on-line TE - in which real-time
network traffic is processed and engineered paths are adjusted
accordingly based on actual network conditions?
-
- Thanks,
- Irwin
| |
|