The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2003-Mar> msg00034



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Fwd: A question on ATM and MPLS

  • From: Roger Clark Williams <rogerw@nordlink.com>
  • Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 00:48:53 -0500
  • Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 13:10:46 -0500
  • To: MPLS-ops Mailing List <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
  • X-Sender: rogerw@together.net@pop.mindspring.com

RIck, here is one take on it:

MPLS, since it runs over IP, can run happily on a network that is running IP over ATM. The ATM is effectively invisible to the MPLS as it would be to IP. The ATM switches and the ATM pipes between switches are simply open pipes to IP, and therefore to MPLS. This would be called "frame mode over ATM" (thanks to Pepelnjak and Guichard).

In this case, the label switch/routers "see" each other through the pipe, labels are exchanged directly between MPLS routers but across the ATM links, routing goes on just as it would with IP. The ATM is simply providing a path that is invisible to IP. I think the better image is a pipe because as a kid I would look through a long pipe under the road and see - the other side! Nothing between me and there.

Network design is still an issue, and that depends on your particular needs, how your traffic needs to flow, link capacities and the like.

Roger Williams

Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 16:16:58 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: host.secure4-hosting.net: mplsrc12 set sender to mpls-ops-request@mplsrc.com using -f
From: RickGall1@aol.com
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:51:49 EST
To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com ('mpls-ops@mplsrc.com')
X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 10500
Subject: [MPLS-OPS]: A question on ATM and MPLS
Resent-From: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
X-Mailing-List: <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com> archive/latest/5428
X-Loop: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
Resent-Sender: mpls-ops-request@mplsrc.com

I was sent a question (below) that I think that you that are more ATM aware might be able to help with if you will...

Thank you
Rick Gallaher

I have had numerous discussions with co-workers on how to implement MPLS over an existing ATM network.  My initial thought is that it would be beneficial to have an MPLS aware ATM function in the LER.  This would allow the control of the ATM plane at the ingress side of the network.  However there are case in which the vendor is not producing MPLS awareness into their ATM support.  If that's the case then I need to treat the PVC as just that, however I am a little fuzzy on how that would work and how the label gets carried to the LSR.  Any suggestions. Thanks.



------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml