The MPLS-OPS Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]
Fwd: A question on ATM and MPLS
-
From: Roger Clark Williams <rogerw@nordlink.com>
-
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 00:48:53 -0500
-
Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 13:10:46 -0500
-
To: MPLS-ops Mailing List <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
-
X-Sender: rogerw@together.net@pop.mindspring.com
RIck, here is one take on it:
MPLS, since it runs over IP, can run happily on a network that is running
IP over ATM. The ATM is effectively invisible to the MPLS as it would be
to IP. The ATM switches and the ATM pipes between switches are simply
open pipes to IP, and therefore to MPLS. This would be called "frame
mode over ATM" (thanks to Pepelnjak and Guichard).
In this case, the label switch/routers "see" each other through
the pipe, labels are exchanged directly between MPLS routers but across
the ATM links, routing goes on just as it would with IP. The ATM is
simply providing a path that is invisible to IP. I think the better image
is a pipe because as a kid I would look through a long pipe under the
road and see - the other side! Nothing between me and there.
Network design is still an issue, and that depends on your particular
needs, how your traffic needs to flow, link capacities and the
like.
Roger Williams
Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003
16:16:58 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: host.secure4-hosting.net: mplsrc12 set sender
to mpls-ops-request@mplsrc.com using -f
From: RickGall1@aol.com
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:51:49 EST
To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com ('mpls-ops@mplsrc.com')
X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 10500
Subject: [MPLS-OPS]: A question on ATM and MPLS
Resent-From: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
X-Mailing-List: <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com> archive/latest/5428
X-Loop: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
Resent-Sender: mpls-ops-request@mplsrc.com
I was sent a question (below) that I think that
you that are more ATM aware might be able to help with if you will...
Thank you
Rick Gallaher
I have had numerous discussions with co-workers on how to implement MPLS
over an existing ATM network. My initial thought is that it would
be beneficial to have an MPLS aware ATM function in the LER. This
would allow the control of the ATM plane at the ingress side of the
network. However there are case in which the vendor is not
producing MPLS awareness into their ATM support. If that's the case
then I need to treat the PVC as just that, however I am a little fuzzy on
how that would work and how the label gets carried to the LSR. Any
suggestions. Thanks.
-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
| |
|