The MPLS-OPS Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]
Re: MTU problems in EoMpls domain..
-
From: "Tarun Bhalla" <tarun.bhalla@wipro.com>
-
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:04:21 -0800
-
Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 05:08:32 -0500
-
To: <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>, "Wulf Losee" <qx49@attbi.com>
-
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Mar 2003 08:41:43.0446 (UTC) FILETIME=[B31C4B60:01C2EF85]
Wulf..
thanx for the prompt reply.. yeah!! i know
abt cisco/juniper providing certain cmds that
mention things like jumbo frames.. also in
many
cases the core consists of Sonet.. where the
frame
size is 4470 bytes.. so not a big problem there
also..
bt as i already told this test is happening on some
test
setups.. so for that we have 3 set of
Linux machines
(Ingress, Egress and transit) and nothing more and
also having MPLS Linux patch to enable MPLS on them.
One option is that i change the NIC cards of the
intermediate
interfaces to jumbo cards.. but am not going for
that.. so have
to implement fragmentation there.. but that is also
not a problem
rather my issue is since this problem is going to
be there in
the MPLS networ, how has the community addressed
this issue??
I mean is there any standd way of fragmentation and
reassembly
in Layer 2 which is also not time consuming..
Thanks & Regards Tarun
B _________________________________________________ Tarun Bhalla Wipro
Technologies 26 Hosur Main Road, Bommanahalli, Bangalore- 560 068.
India Tel +91-80-5732293, Extn 3139 < http://www.wipro.com/>
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 8:28
PM
Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: MTU problems in
EoMpls domain..
Tarun: You didn't mention what sort of routers you're using.
But I know that both Cisco and Juniper offer a way to change the MTU value on
the Ethernet interfaces. On Cisco it's 'tag-switching mtu 1504' (actually,
1504 sounds too small, but it's past my bedtime, and I don't have the patience
to think it through ;-). And I'm afraid I don't remember the syntax for
Juniper.
As I recall Cisco actually allows MTU values of up to 1526 --
maybe that's why I think the 1504 is too small. Push it up to
1526...
If you don't have Cisco or Juniper, it *may* be that the brand
of router you're using doesn't support a similar command -- but I think they'd
have to! Check your manual...
cheers, --Wulf
At 10:11 AM
3/21/03 -0800, Tarun Bhalla wrote:
hi
all, I am new to this mailing
list. so hi to all.. now my problems :(( Actually, I am trying to handle the problem of fragmentation in
Ethernet over MPLS
network. This is the existing
network topology... LAN A
-------> MPLS Domain ----------> LAN
B To implement EoMPLS, I am
capturing the packet in Ingress of the MPLS domain and trying to send this as a payload over the MPLS
domain.. When I am doing this the problem
is that the frames which are 1500 bytes (normal ethernet frames) can not be sent across this MPLS domain as the
payld of this domain can only be 1496
bytes... (4 bytes label gets added and leave the matter when multiple labels are added).. So, I am stuck as i am
not able to send 1500 bytes frames..
These all things are being
carried on test setups. So, I can not have
the liberty or leisure to use SONET interfaces as my core n/w
interfaces.. also am not sure what to do
in order to make use of jumbo ethernet
frames... So, the only option left is to fragment the frames when i
capture the ethernet frames.. but for
that i need ur advice.. I mean
is there any standard methodology that says how to handle fragmentation in ethernet layer cos I will have to anyway
go to this final resort.. or is there any
other way arnd. ?? Thanks &
Regards Tarun
B _________________________________________________ Tarun
Bhalla Wipro Technologies 26 Hosur Main Road,
Bommanahalli, Bangalore- 560 068. India Tel +91-80-5732293, Extn
3139 <http://www.wipro.com/>
|