The MPLS-OPS Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]
RE: OSPF and RIP
-
From: Spice Sylvia <falsesylvia@yahoo.co.uk>
-
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 14:22:33 +0100 (BST)
-
Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
-
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 10:10:55 -0400
-
To: alok.dube@apara.com, lhigham@yahoo.com
Hi Alok,
You could see if its possible to run OSPF "per VR" and see if that helps.
like:
R1---VRF1(OSPF)---L2LSPbetween2VRs----VRF2(OSPF)--R2
VRF1 and VRF2 can for adjacencies.
If LSPs are VRF to VRF, it might be possible to do this.
Myself never tried it, perhaps others on the list may have.
-S.F.
Alok Dube <alok.dube@apara.com> wrote:
hi Lars,
I am sorry I think I have not worded my question properly.
What I want to know is this
CE1 and cE2 are connected at 2 points in a VPN
they run OSPF/RIP which needs to be distributed into BGP etc and then back on the other side into RIP...etc..Am i right? I want to know if one can avoid the "BGP into IGP" part.
Now is there a "multihop" variation of RIP or OSPF that could be run directly between the CEs? In other words, the PE needs not put the BGP routes into IGP? but PE needs to put "IGP into BGP" just for reachability. am I a bit clearer? or maybe not? :o)
> Alok, see below: > > Regards, > Lars Higham > > > -----Original Message----- > From: alok [mailto:alok.dube@apara.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 10:35 PM > To: mpls-op!
s@mplsrc.com > Subject: [MPLS-OPS]: OSPF and RIP > > > Hi, > > what distinguishes OSPF from RIP in terms of a IGP in an MPLS network? > OSPF is more resource intensive > OSPF has faster convergence > RIP is generally easier to configure and troubleshoot - lower > complexity RIP v1 doesn't support VLSM; RIP v2 and OSPF do > TTBOMK, RIP doesn't support traffic-engineering as do OSPF and ISIS > > are protocols in UDP not route-able? > Eh? > > or are protocols in IP not routeable? > Eh? > > if both are, why do we have to consider BGP into OSPF distribution? > Depends on the design and requirements of the network; ISPs generally > don't distribute BGP routes into the IGP whereas an enterprise using > BGP as the global core might (again, depending on the network design) > gain more accurate routing from doing so. > > why not L3VPN ru!
nning OSPF or RIP? > Where? PE-CE? You can - > > very *grey* question, but would appreciate if someone could clarify. > > -rgds > Alok > > > ------- > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml > > ------- > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
| |
|