The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2003-May> msg00143



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: Fast reroute extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels

  • From: "carlos" <carlos@carlos.net>
  • Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 06:36:51 -0700
  • Resent-Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 10:48:12 -0400
  • To: "Vinaychandra A V S" <vinaychandra.sham@wipro.com>, "Rohit Mediratta" <rohit_medi@yahoo.com>, <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vinaychandra A V S" <vinaychandra.sham@wipro.com>
To: "Rohit Mediratta" <rohit_medi@yahoo.com>; <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 2:29 AM
Subject: RE: [MPLS-OPS]: Fast reroute extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels


> Rohit,
> 
> The problem you have described will not occur, as addresses in ERO will
> usually denote the outgoing interfaces.

It really depends on each implemenation.Some vendor uses <out-if,in-if>
pairs in ERO.

> Even if there are more than 1 entries in the ERO, belonging to the same
> node, the ERO processing rules laid out in RFC 3209 will take care of
> ignoring the redundant ones.

Yes, but it's depend on implementation again.Some implementation
may be too 'conversative' to accept other vendor behavior :-)


Carlos

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml