The MPLS-OPS Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]
RE: Question about L2VPN over MPLS
-
From: Spice Sylvia <falsesylvia@yahoo.co.uk>
-
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:11:15 +0000 (GMT)
-
Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
-
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:38:14 -0500
-
To: sthaug@nethelp.no, robert.mccallum@thus.net
Hi Steiner,
I agree L2VPN does have a market [forgive the sarcasm but so does poison :)].
The point I do not quite get is why would the end user want a termination point on a Packet switching device with the SP?
Are you saying that the cost difference between buying a Layer 2 switch versus a Layer 3 switch is "so highly significant"?
Why would he not buy a Layer 3 switch (if what he wants is ethernet) , take a link and connect it off to the SDH/SONET multiplexer provided by the SP and use the same? What is the benefit he gets by terminating at a Packet switching kind of device on the SP end?
sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
> The real problem with VPLS lies not in the technology but the actual > SLA that you can offer the customer. Just ask Cisco the question > and all you get back is "we would never recommend a vpls solution > due to the SLA issues". This is the main reason Cisco are very slow > to market with VPLS as they don't actually belive there is a "real" > requirement for it.
It is not obvious to me that VPLS has SLA problems. Also, there are other vendors than Cisco (for instance Juniper), with more mature VPLS solutions.
> Please don't mix this up with L2vpn as this is completely different. > Point to point L2vpns (especially ethernet) are at the moment the > hot sell for my company. In the space of 1 year we have sold > hundreds of these types of links throughout the whole of Britain.
Well, I work for a !
company
that also sells both point to point *and* point to multipoint L2. As far as we can see, there's a market for both types of solutions.
> If the customer wants any-any connectivity I would always push them > down the L3VPN solution. I would also offer them OSPF, RIPv2 or > EIGRP (something which our company differs on other SP's).
I would also in most cases push L3 solutions - mostly because I find them easier to debug. But there's definitely a market for L2 point to multipoint.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtmlplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends
today! Download Messenger Now
| |
|