The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2004-Mar> msg00107



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

RE: Question about L2VPN over MPLS

  • From: Spice Sylvia <falsesylvia@yahoo.co.uk>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:11:15 +0000 (GMT)
  • Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
  • Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:38:14 -0500
  • To: sthaug@nethelp.no, robert.mccallum@thus.net

Hi Steiner,
 
I agree L2VPN does have a market [forgive the sarcasm but so does poison :)].
 
The point I do not quite get is why would the end user want a termination point on a Packet switching device with the SP?
 
Are you saying that the cost difference between buying a Layer 2 switch versus a Layer 3 switch is "so highly significant"?
 
Why would he not buy a Layer 3 switch (if what he wants is ethernet) , take a link and connect it off to the SDH/SONET multiplexer provided by the SP and use the same? What is the benefit he gets by terminating at a Packet switching kind of device on the SP end?


sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
> The real problem with VPLS lies not in the technology but the actual
> SLA that you can offer the customer. Just ask Cisco the question
> and all you get back is "we would never recommend a vpls solution
> due to the SLA issues". This is the main reason Cisco are very slow
> to market with VPLS as they don't actually belive there is a "real"
> requirement for it.

It is not obvious to me that VPLS has SLA problems. Also, there are
other vendors than Cisco (for instance Juniper), with more mature VPLS
solutions.

> Please don't mix this up with L2vpn as this is completely different.
> Point to point L2vpns (especially ethernet) are at the moment the
> hot sell for my company. In the space of 1 year we have sold
> hundreds of these types of links throughout the whole of Britain.

Well, I work for a ! company that also sells both point to point *and*
point to multipoint L2. As far as we can see, there's a market for
both types of solutions.

> If the customer wants any-any connectivity I would always push them
> down the L3VPN solution. I would also offer them OSPF, RIPv2 or
> EIGRP (something which our company differs on other SP's).

I would also in most cases push L3 solutions - mostly because I find
them easier to debug. But there's definitely a market for L2 point to
multipoint.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtmlplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml


Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now