The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: Propogating PE + P loopbacks only
to be absolutely precise, you really only need the label for the PE advertised next-hops (generally the loopbacks). just curious, what is the motivation for doing this? On Oct 25, 2004, at 3:57 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:44:41PM +0100, mike_chapman@tiscali.co.uk > wrote: >> I thing I am right in saying that I only need to advertise labels for >> PE >> and P boxes (their loopbacks) in a simple MPLS VPN core network - >> please >> correct me if I am wrong. Can someone tell me how I can do this on >> cisco >> routers or point me in the right direction. > > no mpls ldp advertise-labels > mpls ldp advertise-labels for loopbacks > > ip access-list standard loopbacks > remark Loopback IP range to limit LDP label advertisements > permit <your prefix(es) where your loopbacks are in> > deny any > > > Best regards, > Daniel > > -- > CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 > > ------- > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml > > -- Aamer Akhter / aa@cisco.com NSITE cisco Systems ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|