The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] comments on NHRP IV
[..] >>p. 4: I'm not sure that the concept of encapsulation is useful. To me >>that means placing a whole packet within another packet. The *data* of >>an NHRP request is placed in an IP packet, yes, but are you doing >>anything more than that? If so is it really necessary? Scott, I think thats a good question. I'm under the impression that it allows NHRP request/responses to be routed to NHSs through the existing overlay IP network - perhaps this could be clarified by someone else? I remember suggesting (during the last IETF) that NHRP clients could instead use a new ARP packet format on the 'first resolution hop' between client and configured NHS. NHSs could then use IP encapsulation (or whatever) to convey NHRP requets/responses amongst themselves. Why did I suggest this? Because I'm a habitual heretic, and still not comfortable with a link destination resolution mechanism appearing to run over IP. gja (quietly putting on asbestos suit)
|
|