The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] ARP and NHRP question
> From laubach@terra.com21.com Sat Dec 2 12:59:54 1995 > Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 13:11:37 -0800 (PST) > From: Mark Laubach <laubach@terra.com21.com> > To: Juha Heinanen <jh@lohi.dat.tele.fi> > Cc: carlm@fore.com, asmith@BayNetworks.COM, bryang@eng.adaptec.com, > ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com, rolc@nexen.com, carlm@fore.com > Subject: Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark, > The next step of anything we do in a step-by-step > process requires the support of existing implementations and will still > require atmarp code in the client. What you propose is just one way of providing a transition plan. An equally valid plan would deploy multi-protocol support in the servers and only a single protocol in the clients. > Granted, that we decided to aim > towards NHRP at the Danver's meeting - it is just that it takes two steps > to get there, not one. It only requires one step in the clients - that is the important issue here. > Mark Andrew P.S. I apologise for not attending the IETF meetings - other commitments preclude. ******************************************************************************** Andrew Smith TEL: +1 408 764 1574 Technology Synergy Unit FAX: +1 408 988 5525 Bay Networks, Inc. E-m: asmith@baynetworks.com Santa Clara, CA ******************************************************************************** |
|