The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt (2)
Andrew, > Why is this a ROLC i-d/RFC? > > This is just as much an ip-atm issue? I don't see any large-cloud-specific > stuff in this draft, although I agree it is not atm-specific. > The draft does, however, address many of the points raised by papers like > the Framework document in ip-atm. Maybe it should be just an "IETF" or "IAB" > draft? But in that case, you should probably give it wider circulation than > just the ROLC list before RFCing it - I know many people who did not know of > the existence of this draft because they are not interested in large clouds > and don't follow ROLC. > > Also, might it not be a good idea to try to get some of these ideas on the > standards track, rather than letting them languish as "informational"? > Just a thought. These are mostly procedural questions, and I hope that either Joel (as the Routing AD) or Andy (as the ROLC WG chair) would be in a better position to answer them. Yakov.
|
|