The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1995-Oct> msg00059



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt

  • From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Oct 95 18:23:12 PDT
  • cc: rolc@nexen.com
  • X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com

Andrew,

> > While it would be hard to say that the ATM SVCs are *always* more desirable,
> > I think it would be fair to say that there are QoS requirements where ATM SVC
> > would be preferred to IP hop-by-hop resource reservations.  It all depends
> > on the QoS requirements.
> 
> You are missing my point: Dilip asserted that "ATM SVCs are more desirable ...".
> All I am saying is that "ATM SVCs may be more desirable in some cases ...". 

Ok. Seems that at least two of us are in agreement on this.

Yakov.