The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1995-Sep> msg00006



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Purge packet

  • From: gardo@vnet.ibm.com
  • Date: Sat, 23 Sep 95 14:59:19 EDT
  • cc: rolc@nexen.com
  • Ref: Your note of Fri, 11 Aug 95 09:40:51 EDT
  • X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com

Andy,

> ...I was thinking
> the purge should contain at least the IP address info for the subnet
> the target is part of.

I think David is proposing that a prefix mask be added to the PURGE
packet?  I think this is a good idea.

Also, I noticed a possible typo in the draft:
Do you know why the "A" bit is in bit position 0 of the PURGE packet
but always in bit position 2 of the other packets?

Have a nice day!

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Purge packet
      • From: Koichi Horikawa <horikawa@nwk.cl.nec.co.jp>