The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1996-Apr> msg00015



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Limits on SVCCs

  • From: Grenville Armitage <gja@bellcore.com>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 16:17:47 -0400
  • cc: rolc@nexen.com, gja@thumper.bellcore.com

Derya,

No answers, but I'll add another consideration to your list:

>>One of the considerations in using NHRP is to be selective in establishing
>>short-cuts. This is motivated by at least two reasons: One, it is not worth
>>to go through the signaling procedures when the application is of short
>>duration. The other one is that, in all likelihood, there is a limit on the
>>number of SVCC that an ATM host or an end user router with ATM interface can
>>establish.

Thirdly, the cost of the new VC wrt the original one that the client
presumably had open to their default router. Customers need to
be able to characterize the total benefit to themselves before
they'll be happy having NHRP tell them to place a long-distance
ATM call instead of a local call. 

cheers,
gja