The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1996-May> msg00153



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Maybe RSVP and Q.2931, but not NHRP

  • From: Grenville Armitage <gja@bellcore.com>
  • Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 09:46:47 -0400
  • cc: gja@thumper.bellcore.com

[Scott Marcus commented..]
>>At 10:36 PM 5/29/96, Masataka Ohta wrote:
        [..some context deleted..]
>>>I don't think Fram Relay is practical...
>>
>>Paul Ferguson already responded to this much as I would have.  Large
>>numbers of these networks are deployed and running today.  They're doing
>>useful work, and they're operationally tractable.  No further proof of
>>their practicality is necessary.
>>
>>And they are clearly within the charter of this group.

As a meta-observation I trust this sort of exchange is not
going to typify the new ION group? If Masataka (or others)
can't criticise one NBMA technology without someone jumping in
with an "but its in the charter of the group, so there." type
response then I think we'll be wasting a hell of a lot of time.

I understood the group merger to assist in sharing IP-over-X
technologies where it makes sense, not to force us all to
like every NBMA technology out there.

gja