Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: self-similar traffic model references need
In article <ntwkD7t6sv.7B0@netcom.com> ntwk@netcom.com (Network Synthesis) writes: >A short summary of this property is that data traffic >follows the human activity of the users. ... >To carry this farther, in order to understand the behavior of >computer networks, you need to understand how and why people use >those networks. In order to understand how and why people use >computer networks, you have to understand people. Because of this, >when using self-similar models of data traffic, you should >understand and acknowledge that the models are not models of >collections of machines but instead are models of people >interacting with computers and each other. > ... That is a fine jape, combining technobabble and politically correct "concern" for people, but I fear less technically informed readers might take it seriously. The phrase "self-simlar" in the famous "self-similar network traffic" papers has a technical meaning and nothing more to do with "human behavior" than it does when used in connection with the orbits of the planets. >From "On the Self-Similar Nature of Ethernet Traffic (Extended Version)" in _IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking_, vol 2, no.1 Feb 1994, page 1: ... presence of of "burstiness" accros an extremely wide range of time scales: traffic "spikes" ride on longer-term "ripples," that in turn ride on still longer term "swells," etc. This _self-similar_ or _fractal_-like behavor ... Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com |
|