Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: ATM addresses, Subnet masks et al
yes, I've got a print-out of the document, which I've found extremely useful and thorough. Do you have any opinions about how things are going with this standard? What about the choice of IDC v DCC? Given the UK-centric nature of the academic entwork. I suppose DCC is your best option... Andy In your message dated Wednesday 18, December 1996 you wrote : > > UKERNA have done an interim ATM addressing scheme see > > URL: http://www.ed.ac.uk/~george/ukac-index.html > > > cheers > Jim Jackson > > On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, Andy Leigh wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > the time has come... > > > > We really need to start tying down an ATM Address structure for our > > organisation (c 25k employees, UK-based, no private links leaving the > > country) and I'm looking into what's needed. I've searched the web and > > found a few references, and it seems that everyone feels as I do, > > namely that something has to be done, but breaking too soon could > > cause problems later on. However, we have to do something fast, > > considering the amount of ATM popping up all over. > > > > My thinking is this: It's a private network, so don't use E.164. We > > might need multiple Telcos to supply our WAN needs, so don't use NSAP > > E.164. This just leaves DCC and ICD. Given that we're very much > > UK-based, we don't really need an International identifier (although, > > we _are_ well known internationally). Which leaves me with the DCC > > NSAP-type address. > > > > My question is this: What is everyone else doing? And, what is the > > most popular system today? (I think I was told that the ICD was the > > most popular) > > > > Also, the High Order DSP can be broken up into subnets, to allow > > hierarchical information hiding and aggregation (just like IP). I've > > not seen any references on how to go about this. Are there rules, like > > IP (RFC1121). Specifically, how is the mask confifigured? Do the bits > > need to be contiguous? Are any numbers illegal (like IP, where > > network, subnet and host addresses must not be all 1s or all 0s)? > > > > Any advice or experience you have would be gratefully received! If you > > haven't thought about this before, now's youe time to dig into the > > debate. > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > -- Andy Leigh andy@legion.demon.co.uk |
|