Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: multicast ATM switches/copy function
In article <6e5jee$200@alca.helsinki.fi>, vhalkka@cc.helsinki.fi writes: > Do you mean, that when the DAGGL-BA card receives unicast > cells it knows where to send them through the crossbar, > but when the cells come from a BUS VC the cells are sent > to the master line card which then makes a number of copies > and sends them to every receiving port, one by one ? > > Or is the receiving slave DAGGL-BA able to this ? I don't know. I mostly worked on the prototype hardware rather than the software/firmware. The hardware could do it either way - the cost is the same. I'd expect the receiving card to do it. That would reduce the workload on the master card. [But what I expect doesn't always happen.] You could find out by running some experiments. Setup a UBR multicast VC through a line card and run a test over it to measure the bandwidth. Then setup and run a similar test over another line card. If the master is doing all the work the throughput on the first test will go down when you start up the second test. -- These are my opinions, not necessarily my employers. |
|