Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: Ip over Sonet / SDH
James Carlson wrote: > > Walt Weber <waltweber@sprintmail.com> writes: > > How does a network using routers and IP over Sonet compare with a network > > using IP over ATM on a throughput as well as cost per bit basis? > > The additional overhead is approximately 12%, if you're comparing > IP-over-SONET versus IP-over-ATM-over-SONET. > > When running IP directly over SONET, the per-packet overhead is a > fixed 9 bytes of HDLC address/control, PPP protocol number, 32 bit > CRC, and flag character plus 2/256 of the data (on average) for > escaping. If you assume 256 byte user packets, this means that 267 > bytes are transmitted for 256 bytes of data, giving about 96% > utilization. > > When running IP over ATM, there are at least two penalties. There's a > 5/53 cell tax plus a per-packet internal fragmentation loss in the > final AAL-5 frame of, on average, (48-8)/2 bytes. (If you're trying > to run anything but IP in that VC, or if you have to do FRF.8 > internetworking, then you also have a penalty of 6 to 8 bytes of > LLC/SNAP cruft, and ATM is a little worse.) > > If we again assume average 256 byte packets and null-encapsulation > (the best case for ATM overhead), this is an average of 20 bytes of > overhead for fragmentation plus 5 bytes for each cell, giving about > 84% utilization. > > If you want to do it as cost-per-bit, then ATM is about 15% more > expensive than raw IP (96/83). > I'm not sure this is really an issue ! ATM gives you QOS with a overhead of 15% it seems. QOS in IP make the assumption of abundance in bandwidth ( = 50% extra bandwidth overhead ??). Newer ATM encapsulation techniques with QOS in mind use TCP over ATM, thereby getting rid of the IP overhead of TCP/IP. Is bandwidth really the issue ? > -- > James Carlson, Consulting S/W Engineer <carlson@ironbridgenetworks.com> > IronBridge Networks / 55 Hayden Avenue 71.246W Vox: +1 781 372 8132 > Lexington MA 02421-7996 / USA 42.423N Fax: +1 781 372 8090 > "PPP Design and Debugging" --- http://people.ne.mediaone.net/carlson/ppp -- +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Koen Peeters || E-mail: koen@ciminko.be | | CIMINKO NV || http://ciminko.be/ | | Catherinalaan 37 || Tel. : +32 16 441933 | | 3110 ROTSELAAR || GSM : +32 95 501933 | | Belgium || Fax : +32 16 441007 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
|