Cell Relay Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1999-May> msg00046



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: Why atm use 53 byte?

  • From: George Marshall <george@marshalls.org>
  • Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 04:52:21 GMT
  • Organization: @Home Network
  • X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net


AT?T 64, rest of world 32?

snackman wrote:

> I was at the meeting where this was adopted.  It was actually AT&T against
> the rest of the world.
>
>     Jim
> > >
> > > In fact, the 48 octet length was an arbitrary compromise between the two
> > > as suggested by an earlier poster.  I'd suggest having a look at IEEE
> > > Communications or IEEE Network magazines from 1987 to 1989 time frame if
> > > you want to see the discussions.
> > >
> > > gro_nospam_@org.chemie.uni-frankfurt.de wrote:
> > >
> > >
> >