Cell Relay Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: Is there any performance parameter for AAL?
Thank you. And, I have a question, too. How do you think about the variable "permit" in I.363.2 ? It's a headache for me. I hate the variable "permit". What's your opinion ? Thanks, in advance. > >Indeed, you're right. There's no defined value for Timer_CU. > >However, you may define programmable # of clk cycles(2^15 to 2^20) for >TImer_CU. It'd be proprietary though... At least until something is nailed down >in either ITU spec or the ATM Forum spec. I guess ATM Forum will have an >upcoming meeting on AAL2 recom. in May. Perhaps you can find a stardardized >value for Timer_CU. > >Baris > >novice wrote: > >> Thank you. >> >> And, Is there any default or permitted value of Timer_CU for AAL2 ? >> >> I mean what's the unit( us or ms or sec) of Timer_CU. >> More specifically, what size(how many bits) of exponent and mantissa is >> assigned for Timer_CU? >> >> There is no word in I.363.2. >> They're saying ffs. >> >> I think it's a critical problem implementing I.363.2 AAL2 CPS. >> >> Thanks, in advance. >> >> > >> >Check out the ATM Forum document(straw ballot) "Local Loop Emulation using >> >AAL2". It should have some recommendations for parameters. >> > >> >Baris >> > >> > >> >novice wrote: >> > >> >> Is there any recommendation or document of performance parameter for AAL >> >> (especially for AAL2)? >> >> >> >> Thanks, in advance. >> > >
|
|