Cell Relay Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:2000-Jul> msg00026



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: SRTS

  • From: "unknownLurker" <Lurk@me.com>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 01:35:45 GMT
  • Organization: @Home Network
  • X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net

We had problems with certain types of fiber systems until we turned on DS3
scrambling.

Do you know what happens when you run a DS3 PRBS over the link?  I agree
with the other post - get the DS3 to run clean first.

<agallo@foghorn.nit.gwu.edu> wrote in message
Twmd5.2767$J7.30018@grover.nit.gwu.edu">news:Twmd5.2767$J7.30018@grover.nit.gwu.edu...
>
> Question about Synchronous residual Time Stamp (SRTS): is it required for
> implementing ATM over DS-3?  I have a microwave based DS-3 connecting two
> Marconi (FORE) 200BXs.  One side is receiving framing errors, the other
side
> is relatively clean.  The radio vendor (Nortel) is claiming that SRTS will
be
> required to make this link work.  The switch vendor agrees that it may
solve
> the problem, but it is not required by the ATM Forum and customer demand
> for this feature is almost non-existant on native (non CES) DS-3.
>
> I can't find info abour SRTS on the ATMF approved specs or spec watch
page.
>
> TIA
>
> --
>
>
>
> Andrew Gallo 202-994-9026
> IS Engineer
> The George Washington University
> *******************************************
> PGP Key available at http://gwu.edu/~agallo
> *******************************************



  • References:
    • SRTS
      • From: <agallo@foghorn.nit.gwu.edu>