The IP Over NBMA (ION) Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>ION Archive>month:1996-Aug> msg00081



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Request for progress to Informational RFC

  • From: Albert Manfredi <manfredi@engr05.comsys.rockwell.com>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 10:16:55 -0700
  • CC: ion@nexen.com
  • Organization: Rockwell Defense Electronics - Collins

mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp wrote:

> > > ATM does not mean Q.2931 signaling.
> >
> > Whoa. Maybe "cell switching" doesn't mean Q.2931, but ATM _certainly_
> > means Q.2931.
> 
> You had better ask ITU to revise Q.2931 to include IFMP and RSVP.

<Chuckle>

Masataka, they would laugh in my face. They would tell me that they have
a much more advanced version of RSVP already built into Q.2931, so why
degrade it?

Bert
manfredi@engr05.comsys.rockwell.com