The IP Over NBMA (ION) Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] draft-armitage-ion-cluster-size-00.txt
Masataka, [..] >>But, though you mentioned CSRs in the draft, I don't think CSRs >>are useful for cell-by-cell communication of best effort traffic. Ah. Okay.. [..] >>Then, though you wrote: >> >> A possible solution is for the CSR's underlying cell switching fabric >> to provide AAL_SDU-aware cell forwarding. If segmented AAL_SDUs >> arriving from the source Cluster could be buffered and forwarded >> in groups of cells representing entire AAL_SDUs, the CSR would need >> only a single SVC into the target Cluster. >> >>it will create a packet delay worse than that of packet based >>relaying. >> >>That is, if you transmit a 800byte packet over a dedicated 64Kbps >>VC, packets from other sender are blocked 0.1 seconds. I would buffer the incoming AAL_SDUs, but not block the outbound SVC. Access to the outbound SVC would be FIFO - first complete AAL_SDU buffered on any incoming SVC would get access to the outbound SVC. Presumably if the outbound SVC was 64kbit/sec then you'd get the same delay whether it was a CSR or a conventional Mrouter. The speed of the inbound links would be less of a problem. cheers, gja
|
|