The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1995-Jan> msg00001



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

RFC Submission . . . .

  • From: salo@msc.edu (Tim Salo)
  • Date: Sun, 1 Jan 1995 22:05:06 -0600
  • CC: ahnidi@mci.net, atm-nap@msc.edu, craig@aland.bbn.com, gja@thumper.bellcore.com, ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com, rbradfor@lightstream.com, rfc-editor@isi.edu, stev-iesg@ftp.com, stev@ftp.com

> To: Mark Laubach <laubach@terra.com21.com>
> Cc: Grenville Armitage <gja@thumper.bellcore.com>,
>         Rich Bradford <rbradfor@lightstream.com>,
>         Craig Partridge <craig@aland.bbn.com>, stev@ftp.com, stev-iesg@ftp.com,
>         ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com, rfc-editor@isi.edu, ahnidi@mci.net,
>         malis@maelstrom.timeplex.com
> Subject: Re: RFC Submission . . . . 
> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 1994 14:01:06 -0500
> From: Andy Malis <malis@maelstrom.timeplex.com>
> 	[...]
>           The RFC should include somewhere a note explicitly stating
> that while stations using the DXI interface can interoperate with each
> other, they cannot interoperate with non-DXI (i.e. native ATM) RFC
> 1577 implementations.

I am not convinved that this, in and of itself, if correct.

A 1490 implementation cannot interoperate with a 1577 implementation.
However, a 1577 implementation operating over DXI ought to interoperate
with a 1577 implementation operating over a native ATM interface.

> 	[...]

-tjs