The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Multicasting with ATM - a concern
> There is an alternative that allows AAL5 to be used for mpt-to-mpt > connections. Namely, set up the connection as a switched VP and > either: 1) allocate a unique VCI to each transmitter > > this is worth considering now that we have switched VP capability in uni > 4.0 signalling and thatfwhich many switches have already implemented for > soft pvp purposes. > > i don't remember how AAL3/4 implements MID allocation, but vci allocation > protocol could be something similar. > > -- juha This is highly inadvisable. Switched VPCs are unlikely to be widely deployed. This is because they make inefficient use of a very scarce resource, the routing (VPI + VCI) field of the ATM cell header. VPCs were intended for, and are still needed for, aggregating of VCCs for purposes such as traffic management, trunking between switches in public and private networks, and failure recovery. Recently, there also have been proposals to also use the VPI as a MAC address in shared media residential broadband networks. VPCs were never intended to be a way for applications to get extra header bits, and widespread misuse for this purpose is inconsistent with their use for their intended purpose. It is true that the signalling group in the ATM Forum did vote by a narrow majority to put switched VPCs in their document, then voted by another narrow majority to take them out, then voted by yet another narrow majority to put them back in. ITU-T has a fairly strong position that switched VPCs are not a service to be offered by public networks. This has to be an indication that industry support for switched VPCs is weak. Regardless of whether people share the concern of many of us for the proper use of the VPI, serious consideration should be given to whether you really want to write an Internet standard assuming the availablity of mechanism which is not going to be widely available. If we're looking for future ways of supporting multipoint-multipoint services, consideration should be given to the ongoing work in ITU on calls (associations amongst ATM endpoints) with multiple (ATM layer) connections. |
|