The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Header Compression.
I would be interested in reading the studies you mentioned. Any
pointers would be appreciated. Local studies here indicate 150-200 to
be the norm but as Curtis said, acks are always around 40 depending on
fields used in the header. I'm not sure that any amount of
compression would ensure ack's were less than 53 bytes but considering
the volume of acks, 50% would chop the total number of packets
considerably.
Boz
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Header Compression.
Author: medved@npr.legent.com (Pat Medved) at ~GW1
Date: 10/20/95 4:06 PM
I was reading some studies which indicate up to 70 % of TCP/IP
packets are < 10 bytes. For ATM that means 2 cells per packet.
If we were using header compression, then these would only need one cell.
I have seen some papers mentioning this. I also saw studies indicating
that the 64KB window size will be too small.
So I had the following questions?
Can RFC1144 be used over ATM? If the final destination
lies on the other side of some router, will the negotiation just
fail for the TCP connection and just not allow compression and not cause
anything
to break?
window size. If RFC1106 size is used (this uses TCP options), can this be used
along with header compression?
Thanks,
Pat Medved
medved@npr.legent.com
|
|