The IP over ATM Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1996-Mar> msg00236



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[Q] Suggest new protocol providing QoS...

  • From: manfredi@engr05.comsys.rockwell.com (Albert E. Manfredi)
  • Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:38:16 -0500
  • X-VMS-Cc: ipatm
  • X-VMS-To: SMTP%"pferguso@cisco.com"

> From:	pferguso@cisco.com    29-MAR-1996 03:27
> To:	Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

> >So, ATM, not IP, should, if any, change.
> >
> >A problem is that, to some, IP is only one technology among many. :-)
> >
> >						Masataka Ohta
> >
> 
> Yes, ATM should change, in so many words.
> 
> IP, like it or not, is entrenched in the global environment [Internet].
> This is not likely to change.

Oh, I dunno. IPv6, RSVP, QoS, IntServ, ... Seems like pretty big changes
to me.

Bert
manfredi@engr05.comsys.rockwell.com