The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-pan-lsp-ping-00.txt]
Ping, > > But is that really such a big win in the long run? > > Yes. Why? > > > If we are tracing LSP to an > > LSR(which could be one of these inetwork LSRs) and if we > dont recieve a > > response from it, it could either be because LSP is down > or the LSR does not > > implement LSP-ping. > > In the draft, it said, "... Before initiating the liveliness test, the > user must make sure that both ingress and egress LSR can support the > LSR-ping." I read that and it doesnt seem to be a very valid assumption. > > > How do you know to distinguish between these two? > > And if you cant, then indirectly it implies that LSP-ping > be implemented > > on all such routers and I think practically thats what > will end up happening. > > Whichever ping mechanism is used, we will end up having > to support it on all > > the routers. > > > > Now you start to scare me. :-) Mission accomplished..;).. - Ravi Shekhar. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
|
|