The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Draft MPLS minutes
Sorry to bother you with admib/process like issues See inline > ---------- > From: George Swallow[SMTP:swallow@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 12:56 AM > To: mpls@UU.NET > Subject: Draft MPLS minutes > > > MPLS WG Meeting Thursday, March 22, 2001 > ======================================== > .. snip ... > 4. MIBs (in IESG last call) > > Definitions of Managed Objects for the Multiprotocol Label Switching, > Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) > <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mib-07.txt> > > MPLS Label Switch Router Management Information Base Using SMIv2 > <draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-mib-07.txt> > > Authors are in the process addressing comments from the IESG. > Another round of last calls is probably not required. > I am not so sure of that. Some serious issues have been found, and I think some real changes may occur. Let's see what the next rev of these drafts will look like first. ... snip .... > 7. Generalized MPLS Signaling drafts > > These drafts are nearly complete. They will be updated based on > the results of CCAMP. Once updated they will be sent for joint > CCAMP and MPLS WG last call. Consensus to do the MPLS WG last call > was reached in this meeting. > This point 7 does not harm I guess... But in principle, "consensus is never reached in a f2f meeting". Need to check for consensus on the WG mailing list. But I guess this could be reworded to say "the meeting agreed to do a WG last call for this doc to gauge consensus on the document". > 8. Unnumbered, Bundle, Hierarchy drafts > > After the "sub IP" re-org, these drafts remain in MPLS. > > Proposal: Accept draft-kompella-mpls-undle-05.txt as working group > draft. Update the draft as draft-mpls-bundle-00.txt. Some of the > other drafts will also be updated. Once updated a WG last call > will be issued. None opposed; consensus. > Again... consensus on this MUST be sought on the WG mailing list. ... snip .... > IV. LDP Fault Tollerance Philip Matthews > <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ft-01.txt> > > Summarized draft. Discussed changes between last version and current > version. Expect to ask for wg last call soon. Requested comments now or > via > mailing list. > > George: Consensus to put this draft to a wg last call. Luca Martini > opposes > wg last call; no other objections. > Make sure we have consensus on WG mailing list! Bert
|
|