The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2000-Sep> msg00004



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

RE: Encapsulation question ?

  • From: "Donkin, Richard" <rdonkin@orchestream.com>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:38:36 +0100
  • Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
  • Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 06:38:42 -0400
  • To: "'Senthilkumar Rajasekharan'" <senthil@caip.rutgers.edu>, Chris Lewis <chrlewis@cisco.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Senthilkumar Rajasekharan [mailto:senthil@caip.rutgers.edu]
> Sent: Sun 24 September 2000 00:24
> To: Chris Lewis
> Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
> Subject: Re: Encapsulation question ?
> 
> 
> 
> > Not sure what you mean. Are you concerned about baby giant 
> packets, when
> > the addition of labels takes the packet over maximum size? Ethernet
> > encapsulation is ethernet encapsulation, Cisco supports all flavors.
> 
> No, Iam trying to establish LSPs between to LSRs over an ethernet
> link for test purposes. Can I do this ?

Yes, you can definitely do this, this is how we set up our testbeds to
simulate an overprovisioned core network (3640 --- ethernet --- 3640).

Richard
-- 
rdonkin@orchestream.com                   http://www.orchestream.com
Tel: +44 (0)20 7348 1507 (direct)         Orchestream Ltd.
     +44 (0)20 7348 1500 (switchboard)    Avon House, Kensington Village,
Fax: +44 (0)20 7348 1501                  Avonmore Road
>>>> IP Service Activation >>>>           London W14 8TS, UK
 

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml