The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: Seriously in need of a good answer
On Wednesday 15 August 2001 19:08, Robert Raszuk wrote: > Hi David, > > Re the LDP maybe what he means is that TDP was in production for a > while while LDP relatively shorter. But I think what you are planning to > do - meaning - to implement LDP is a good decision and will not require > you to transition from TDP into LDP in the future. Keep in mind that Cisco allow individual links to use either LDP or TDP throughout the network. Cisco recommend TDP for exactly this reason; it has been around longer. But migration to LDP should be seamless, once you are happy with its durability. Dave > (Even Cisco's general direction is LDP - no new features will be > implemented in TDP and at some point - not really close but some day it > will be removed). > ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|