The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2001-Oct> msg00212



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

RE: Fwd: FW: MPLS on Foundry and Riverstone

  • From: "Marshall Eisenberg" <marshall@foundrynet.com>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:58:57 -0700
  • Importance: Normal
  • Organization: Foundry Networks Inc
  • Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 22:13:27 -0400
  • To: <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>

All,
Since people are publicly castigating me for my post, please let me add
one more technical inaccuracy attributed to Duane's "good source"...

Juniper does not support draft-martini, so would someone please explain
to me how Riverstone demonstrated (in Duane's words) martini draft
interoperability with Juniper?  I did not know that Juniper supported
the LER functionality (IP to MPLS encap) on their devices...

Regards,

Marshall
408.586.1754 direct
408.586.1900 fax
408.398.0014 cell


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Gray [mailto:eric.gray@sandburst.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:31 PM
To: marshall@foundrynet.com
Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: FW: MPLS on Foundry and Riverstone

Marshall,

    Given the nature of the question/comment made earlier, the
references
below to the things that Foundry DOES do are reasonable.  However, the
statements about what anyone else might or might NOT DO made this an
advertisement - nothing more, nothing less.

    Please do not clutter my mail box with your advertisements...  :-)

You wrote:

> Duane,
>
> I hate to point this out but your 'good source' is not so good...
>
> --
> Eric Gray (mailto:eric.gray@sandburst.com)
> http://www.mindspring.com/~ewgray
>



-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml