The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RE: MPLS on Foundry and Riverstone
Hmmm.. Looks like they run martini to me.
net-iron-400#sh mpls ldp session
Peer LDP Ident: 45.221.0.40:0, Local LDP Ident: 45.221.0.37:1
Active: no, State: Operational
TCP connection: 45.221.0.37:646--45.221.0.40:11046, State: ESTABLISHED
Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
45.221.0.40
127.0.0.12
45.220.254.44
45.221.40.40
net-iron-400#sh mpls vll detail
VLL FDRY_to_Cisco_7600 VC-ID 3740
State: UP
Vll-peer: 45.221.0.40 End-point: untagged e 1/4
Local label: 800000 Remote label: 45
Local group-id: 0
Tunnel LSP: FDRY_to_Cisco_7600 (tnl0)
Even over RSVP tunnels (running through a Juniper in this case)..
net-iron-400#sh mpls rsvp ses de
Ingress RSVP: 1 session(s)
To From State Style Labelin Labelout LSPname
45.221.0.38 45.221.0.37 Up FF - 103125
Foundry_to_Laurel
Time left in seconds (PATH refresh: 1 RESV refresh: 26)
Tspec: peak 0 kbps rate 0 kbps size 0 bytes m 20 M 65535
PATH sentto: 45.221.37.10 (p3/1 )
RESV rcvfrom: 45.221.37.10 (p3/1 )
Egress RSVP: 1 session(s)
To From State Style Labelin Labelout LSPname
45.221.0.37 45.221.0.38 Up FF - -
LaurelToFoundry37
Time left in seconds (PATH refresh: 22 RESV refresh: 15)
Tspec: peak 0 kbps rate 0 kbps size 0 bytes m 20 M 4458
PATH rcvfrom: 45.221.37.10 (p3/1 )
net-iron-400#sh mpls vll de
VLL Foundry_to_Laurel VC-ID 3738
State: UP
Vll-peer: 45.221.0.38 End-point: untagged e 1/3
Local label: 800025 Remote label: 103644
Local group-id: 0
Tunnel LSP: Foundry_to_Laurel (tnl0)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Duane.Wright@186k.co.uk [mailto:Duane.Wright@186k.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:04 AM
> To: ktho@cabletv.com.hk
> Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
> Subject: Re: MPLS on Foundry and Riverstone
>
>
>
> The Foundry NetIron at present doesn't run MPLS martini
> draft or Kompella
> but there is interop info available.
> Riverstone has already implemented Martini draft and it has
> been tested
> with Juniper's & Cisco.
> As regards the performance if the Riverstone it works well.
> In addition there is another emerging standard the Lasserre
> draft which is
> worth watching.
> Perhaps if your more specific in what your attempting to do I
> could shed
> more light on the matter.
>
>
> Duane Wright
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Ho, Kin Tak"
>
> <ktho@cabletv To:
> <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
> .com.hk> cc:
>
> Fax to:
>
> 24/10/2001 Subject: MPLS on
> Foundry and Riverstone
> 05:49
>
> Please
>
> respond to
>
> ktho
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Does anyone have experience of MPLS for Foundry NetIron and Riverstone
> RS8000? Are they compatible with other vendor ? Any comment on their
> performance ?
>
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **************************************************************
> *************
> This e-mail is from 186k Limited and is intended only for the
> addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential
> or privileged information, if you are not the named addressee or
> the person responsible for delivering the message to the named
> addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The
> contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies
> taken.
> 186k Limited is a Lattice Group company, registered in England
> & Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street,
> London SW1Y 4UR
> http://www.186k.co.uk
> **************************************************************
> *************
>
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|