The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2001-Oct> msg00237



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

RE: MPLS on Foundry and Riverstone

  • From: "Chance Whaley" <chance@dreamscope.com>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 13:21:00 -0700
  • Cc: <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
  • Importance: Normal
  • Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 17:37:30 -0500
  • To: "'Andy Walden'" <andy@tigerteam.net>


Not being a specific vendor basher here.. (I am about as vendor agnostic as
it gets)..

Well.. An Agilent and I just showed otherwise in my little lab here.. But
you never know, my methodology could be completely wrong. Gig Agilent -->
8600 gig --> 8600 gig --> 8600 gig --> Gig Agilent.... RSVP based LSP
between the first and third.. whee..

.chance

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Walden [mailto:andy@tigerteam.net]
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:23 AM
> To: Chance Whaley
> Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
> Subject: RE: MPLS on Foundry and Riverstone
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Chance Whaley wrote:
>
> > Riverstone is not wirespeed for any of their interfaces yet, but are
> > working on some products (software and new blades) to make it wire
> > speed.
>
> Jeez guys, if you don't know, don't comment on it. RS doesn't
> release an
> interface unless it is wirespeed, which applies to MPLS also. The
> statement above is simply flatout wrong.
>
> andy
>
> --
> PGP Key Available at http://www.tigerteam.net/andy/pgp
>
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml