The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RE: Next hop Change
Eric, The LDP RFC3036 NH.2 states that label should be removed from forwarding/switching use when a change in FEC next hop is detected. But "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-state-04" state machine seems to operate in a different way. The LDP state machine retains the label till the local/global repair completes/fails. This behavior is different from the described NH algorithm in RFC 3036. I think the state machine behavior should strictly follow whatever is stated in RFC3036!!! Is it really a bug in the draft or did I miss something!! thanks, Kishan --------------------------------- HariKishan Desineni, Ericsson Inc, Santabarbara, California - 93117 Office:(805) 562 6419 Home:(805) 562 8841 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On Behalf > Of Eric Gray > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 6:43 AM > To: Hemant P. Kelkar > Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com; mpls@UU.NET > Subject: Re: Next hop Change > > > Hemant, > > This is an implementation detail. :-) > > When an LSP is established, the local LSR is able to > determine whether > or not it can (or should) detect a change in optimal next > hop. If the LSP is > pinned, or the next hop is a strict hop that is not an > abstract node (i.e. - an > AS or address prefix), then the LSR cannot and should not > attempt to find > a better next hop for the life of the LSP. Otherwise, the > LSR needs to do > whatever implementation specific trick is required in order > to ensure that > it is notified by the appropriate software entity (e.g. - > routing) when the > 'best path' to the LSP next hop (not necessarily the same > as a routing next > hop, for instance), or LSP destination, changes. > > This is not hard to do. > > -- > Eric Gray > > You wrote: > > > Hi Everybody, > > This is regarding the Next Hop change in the LDP state Machine. > > "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-state-04" states that, the LSR can > be configured as > > either "local repair" or "global repair". How does the > LSR detects new > > better next hops ? Which mechanism does it employ to > discover new paths, > > other than LDP advertaisements ? > > > > Regards, > > Hemant > > ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml |
|