The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RE: MPLS VPN over TE tunnel (Cisco)
So does this mean that you can now point a VRF at the ingress point of TE tunnel on Cisco devices, where there are multiple parallel tunnels to the same /32 destination each offering different service to the VPN traffic they contain, for each PE in the network? (should you so desire) Mark G -----Original Message----- From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:raszuk@cisco.com] Sent: 20 February 2002 17:23 To: Mark Lewis Cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com Subject: Re: MPLS VPN over TE tunnel (Cisco) Mark, No it has never been a problem with this. In the past you were simply required to also run on the PE-PE TE tunnel directed TDP/LDP session so your mpls-vpn traffic take the tunnel. This is no longer required. Of course I hope for obvious reasons you still need to run directed LDP over a TE tunnel starting or ending on P boxes. R. > Mark Lewis wrote: > > Guys, > > There has been a problem with running MPLS VPN traffic > over a TE tunnel on Cisco boxes. Does anybody know > whether this has been fixed now ? > > Thanks > > Mark Lewis > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > http://uk.my.yahoo.com > > ------- > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|