The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2002-Feb> msg00143



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

RE: Bridging on an MPLS network....

  • From: "Arun M. Thomas" <arunt@propulsionnetworks.com>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:03:09 -0800
  • Importance: Normal
  • Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 17:05:38 -0500
  • To: ".Mail List: MPLS Ops" <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>

Thanks to all who responded on original question and follow up regarding
this issue.  To summarize the responses I received....

Given an MPLS LSP:   (Ingress) A --> B --> C (Egress)

Packets labelled for this LSP by A will be switched along this LSP.
However, if there is a lower level MPLS unaware network backing this MPLS
network, then packets could be bridged during transit from A to B and from B
to C.  This will result primarily in increased latency through the network,
and should have no other effect.

Thanks again!
-AMT

-----Original Message-----
From: Wade Edwards [mailto:wade.edwards@powerupnetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:44 AM
To: Arun M. Thomas
Cc: .Mail List: MPLS Ops
Subject: RE: Bridging on an MPLS network....


You stated that 1, 2 and 3 could be bridges rather than routers.  Just
want to make sure this is clear.  They have to be bridges and cannot be
routers, in the traditional layer-3 sense.  If they were routers,
traditional layer-3 devices that don't understand MPLS labels, they
would not know what to do with the labeled packets and would drop them.
Just making sure we are on the same page.

L8r.


-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml