The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2002-May> msg00139



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: Ground up MPLS deployment

  • From: "Jacinto Velasco" <Jacinto.Velasco@marconi.com>
  • Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:37:31 +0200
  • Cc: "mpls-ops" <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>, "ryan.brotherton" <ryan.brotherton@spectrum-health.org>
  • Resent-Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 07:48:29 -0400
  • To: "jeffrey.welch" <jeffrey.welch@spectrum-health.org>
  • X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by host.secure4-hosting.net id g4HAfNw00685
  • X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CVDGWY01/S/EXT/MC1(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at17/05/2002 11:41:05


1-> There should not be any regarding the network, but due to mpls
complexivity  the management of the network will need more attention.
2-> I do not think changing to ISIS will introduce any benefit as it should
not be a large network (I guess).
3-> If we think about data traffic (not video) MPLS will not make it any
much better in a small environment, probably you will encounter more
benefits if talking about video packets.

Regards,
Jacinto








jeffrey.welch@spectrum-health.org on 16/05/2002 21:09:00

To:   mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
cc:   ryan.brotherton@spectrum-health.org

Subject:  [MPLS-OPS]: Ground up MPLS deployment




 Ladies and Gentlemen,

 I'm working on a complete network redesign that will replace an ATM core
with a fully meshed redundant Gigabit ethernet core and edge solution. I've
administered MPLS networks in the past, (OC-48 POS backbone running IS-IS,
MPLS and RSVP.) but have never deployed it personally. As this is a brand
new network being implemented, topology and all, it seemed like a good time
to look at MPLS as a possible augmentation to the Gig-E network going into
place. My questions are:

1) Are there any known issues with utilizing MPLS in a smaller MAN (Metro
Area Network) type environment?

2) The current IGP of choice is OSPF. We are not running BGP across the
core at all, as this is a hospital and the internal network that we're
replacing is private. Would a protocol change to IS-IS be beneficial at
all? OR will OSPF work just fine? (I think it will, but just want to be
sure.)

3) MPLS is a good fit within an ethernet environment due to the QoS
constraints inherent in ethernet technology. Will MPLS provide the level of
QoS needed to support the sensitive information contained in a hospital
type network? (This is my first experience in a health care organization,
where lives are literally at times dependant on the information provided
across the network.) 5 nines seems to be the basic requirements here.

 Any information, leads, or suggestions would be a big help.
 Thank you all for your time.

Jeffrey E. Welch
Sr. Data Communications Specialist
Network Infrastructure
Office 616-391-2856
Pager 616-931-6346
Mobile 810-730-3169





-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml