The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2002-May> msg00156



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: AS Border Router

  • From: Ajay Simha <asimha@cisco.com>
  • Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 07:14:25 -0400 (EDT)
  • cc: Rajiv Asati <rajiva@cisco.com>, <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
  • Resent-Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 08:18:07 -0400
  • To: Christopher Poh <tvpoh@essex.ac.uk>

On Mon, 20 May 2002, Christopher Poh wrote:

>CP:Hi again,
>CP:
>CP:Thank you for clarifying about BGP peering. What about if an interior
>CP:router (non-BGP peer) would want to establish a connection to exterior
>CP:routes? Would the LSPs for those routes be available to the interior
>CP:router?


Via IGP? Would there be some label distribution protocol running between this
new non-BGP peer and the internal router? If so yes. If not no.

-ajay

>CP:
>CP:
>CP:5/20/02 1:01:47 PM, Rajiv Asati <rajiva@cisco.com> wrote:
>CP:
>CP:>Christopher,
>CP:>
>CP:>In a MPLS network, an ASBR, which is learning ipv4 routes via an eBGP
>CP:>neighbor, typically doesn't allocate/advertise any label for those ipv4
>CP:>routes that are advertised to its iBGP neighbors.
>CP:>
>CP:>         <-------AS#1-------->        <-----AS#2.--->
>CP:>         R1-------R2--------R3--------------P1---------------P2
>CP:>                 |
>CP:>                 R4
>CP:>
>CP:>So in the above topology, R3 may be learning 10,000 ipv4 routes from P1
>CP:>(which is an eBGP neighbor) and may advertise those 10,000 ipv4 routes to
>CP:>R1 and R4 (R3's iBGP neighbors). From R1 and R4 perspective, R3 is the
>CP:>next-hop for all those 10,000 routes. So, R1 will have a label to reach R3
>CP:>and it will use that single label to reach all those 10,000 routes.
>CP:>Similarly, R4 will also have a label to reach R3 and that label will also
>CP:>be applied to any of those 10,000 prefixes.
>CP:>
>CP:>As far as peering to all the internal routes are concerned, MPLS provides
>CP:>the ability to make core routers BGP free. In other words, R2 above doesn't
>CP:>need to be an iBGP neighbor and so it doesn't need to know about 10,000
>CP:>prefixes.
>CP:>
>CP:>Please let me know if I could be of more help.
>CP:>
>CP:>Rajiv
>CP:>
>CP:>At 09:13 PM 5/19/2002, Christopher Poh wrote:
>CP:>>Hi,
>CP:>>
>CP:>>How does an AS border router advertise and make known to all other routers
>CP:>>within a domain about label/FEC binding information for every exterior
>CP:>>routes it
>CP:>>carry? Does the router need to peer with all the interior routers in order
>CP:>>to distribute this information?
>CP:>>
>CP:>>Hope someone could help me with this.
>CP:
>CP:
>CP:
>CP:-------
>CP:The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
>CP:Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
>CP:Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>CP:

-- 

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml