The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2002-May> msg00161



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: AS Border Router

  • From: Robert Raszuk <raszuk@cisco.com>
  • Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 08:27:13 +0200
  • CC: Umit.Inan@alcatel.com.tr, rajiva@cisco.com, asimha@cisco.com, mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
  • Organization: Signature: http://www.employees.org/~raszuk/sig/
  • Resent-Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 03:47:48 -0400
  • To: Christopher Poh <tvpoh@essex.ac.uk>

Christopher,

> >What LSP you have in mind ? LDP or TE ? If TE as long as those dst are
> >reachable sure no problem. As far as LDP yes the same. After all you can
> >label the default route as well :). Redistributing but only specifics
> >could be yet another way but I am not sure what application such a LSP
> >would be used for.
> 
> If it were to distribute only specific routes, is it true that the LSPs are naturally established through control driven triggered by IGP routing protocol. 

Yes and I think that would be a way to do it ... but again I am still
missing the bigger picture here on the overall application.

R.

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml