The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2002-Nov> msg00044



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: MPLS/VPLS Vendors

  • From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
  • Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:55:12 -0800
  • cc: "Joe Lin" <jlin@doradosoftware.com>, "'alok'" <alok.dube@apara.com>, "'Abe B. Chimpzi'" <ChimpzAreUs@netscape.net>, mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
  • Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 19:14:41 -0500
  • To: fraanro <fraanro@arrakis.es>

> For Ethernet based services I would use:
>    - Martini for point to point services.
>    - Lasserre-vKompella VPLS for multipoint services.
> 
> For ATM, FR, PPP based services I would use:
>    - Kompella. It is more flexible and powerful than only Martini for 
> provisioning. On the other hand, yes, it is a bit more complicated to 
> configure (ranges, ...)

For VPLS consider draft-kompella-ppvpn-vpls-01.txt, as it specifies
not just signaling, but autodiscovery/provisioning as well. And,
by the way, it is build upon the same mechanisms as used by L2-Kompella
(draft-kompella-ppvpn-l2vpn-02.txt).

Yakov.

P.S. Lasserre-vKompella seems to be fairly silent on the issue of
autodiscovery for VPLS - the only place where autodiscovery is
mentioned is the Reference section (it contains pointers to both
DNS and BGP as autodiscovery mechanisms).
 
> 
> ----- Mensaje Original -----
> Remitente: "Joe Lin" <jlin@doradosoftware.com>
> Fecha: Viernes, Noviembre 15, 2002 8:36 pm
> Asunto: RE: [MPLS-OPS]: MPLS/VPLS Vendors
> 
> > From the various conversation I have gathered in the past with 
> > differentpeople.
> > 
> > L2-Kompella is more complicated to implement than l2-martini.
> > 
> > Cisco is aligned with martini, you can't be wrong if you side with
> > cisco.
> > 
> > The choices has nothing to do with what draft is superior...
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: alok [mailto:alok.dube@apara.com] 
> > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:07 AM
> > To: Abe B. Chimpzi; mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
> > Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: MPLS/VPLS Vendors
> > 
> > why is draft martini preferred over the other one?
> > 
> > im just curious...can someone please explain the same?
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Abe B. Chimpzi <ChimpzAreUs@netscape.net>
> > To: <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 12:05 AM
> > Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: MPLS/VPLS Vendors
> > 
> > 
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > According to
> > http://www.laurelnetworks.com/newsEvents/release60302.html,
> > > Laurel Networks also supports draft Martini (Etherne>
> > > Level3 is deploying their platforms, but has anybody else have any
> > > working experience with the box?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Abe.
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________________
> > > The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now!
> > http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp
> > >
> > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at
> > http://webmail.netscape.com/
> > >
> > > -------
> > > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> > > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
> > >
> > 
> > -------
> > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------
> > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
> > 
> 
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml